The Madlanga Commission: Will South Africa Finally Confront Justice System Corruption?

In July 2025, Mkhwanazi publicly claimed that judges and the broader judiciary had ties to criminal networks and drug cartels. He said these links were part of a larger corruption and interference scheme involving politicians, business people, law enforcement, intelligence, prosecutors, etc.

Mkhwanazi has alleged:

1. Infiltration of Law Enforcement & Justice System by Criminal Syndicates

• Mkhwanazi claims that criminal syndicates, including drug cartels, have penetrated structures like SAPS (South African Police Service), metro police, correctional services, prosecutors, intelligence units, and other parts of law enforcement.
• He says politicians, businesspeople, and even judicial members are part of or protected by these corrupt networks.

• Political Interference in Investigations

• He alleges that high-ranking officials, including Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, have interfered with investigations.
• Specifically, he claims that Minister Mchunu ordered the disbandment of the Political Killings Task Team in KwaZulu-Natal, a unit investigating politically-motivated killings.
• He also says over 121 case dockets under that task team were removed or redirected, disrupting the investigation of politically-motivated killings.
• Misuse / Weaponization of Intelligence & Classified Information

• Mkhwanazi accuses some politicians of improperly accessing crime intelligence or sensitive information or using it against investigations.
• There are claims of unauthorized access to intelligence, inappropriate disclosure of classified documents, and pressure on law enforcement or crime-intelligence leadership to drop or interfere with investigations.
• Alleged Collusion Between Judicial/Magistrate Figures and Criminal Actors

• He claims that some judicial officers have engaged in conduct that aids criminal networks. For example, a magistrate named Vusimuzi Mahlangu issued what Mkhwanazi describes as “very bizarre” bail conditions in a case involving the Crime Intelligence head, conditions that weren’t requested by the prosecution, but which had the effect of obstructing or slowing down investigations.
• More broadly, he’s accused the judiciary (in general) of being part of a system that protects or enables criminal illicit actors.
• Obstruction / Sabotage of Police Investigation Units

• Disbanding the Political Killings Task Team.
• Halting or delaying filling vacancies in the SAPS Crime Intelligence Unit, which is supposed to help in investigations.
• Remove crucial case files/dockets from units or transfer them out, which he claims undermines the ability to prosecute.
• Fear for Institutional Collapse if Nothing Changes
• Mkhwanazi says the criminal justice system is under serious threat — corruption, interference, and infiltration are pushing it toward collapse unless urgent reform and oversight are implemented.

The allegations by Mkhwanazi matter because they allude to an undermining of the police and justice system. They involve senior politicians tasked with keeping the country’s citizens safe. It matters because the citizens have the right to know and not be misled.

As testified by Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the Madlanga Commission is tasked with investigating corruption, interference in the justice system, and criminality.

Judge Madlanga is a constitutional court judge with a reputation for integrity, independence, and strong legal reasoning. He isn’t politically compromised, though his rulings and judgments appear left-leaning.

I question whether the judge will remain independent, as the commissioner accused the judiciary of corruption, stating that judges have ties to criminal networks. There is an obvious threat to self-interest and a self-review threat. Will the judge remain unbiased and not be tempted to defend the judiciary?

South Africa has had many inquiry commissions. Let’s take a look at them and their outcomes.

Criticism of commissions is that they are expensive and yield very few prosecutions. The Zondo commission cost a billion rand but saw very few prosecutions. The NPA stated they did not have the budget to investigate the accusations made at the commission any further. Therefore, everyone involved in the state capture did not face any consequences. How disrespectful was this to the citizens of this country? How dare one billion rand of the taxpayers’ money be spent on the commission, only for nothing to happen to the accused? It also makes one wonder whether there was any validity to the state capture claims. Were the state capture claims valid, or were they used to oust Zuma from the presidency?

I have little faith that the Madlanga commission will yield different results. At best, these commissions are purely entertainment for the masses. They give us something to talk about at family dinners.

About The Author

Lungi Nkosi

Hi, I’m Lungi, the writer and researcher behind Political Nexus. I started this blog because I believe politics and history aren’t just distant, academic subjects — they shape how we live, how we understand the world, and how we imagine the future.
I’m not here to lecture; I’m here to ask questions, share insights, and spark conversations. Whether it’s unpacking a breaking news story, looking back at a key moment in history, or analyzing the choices of today’s leaders, I aim to keep things clear, thoughtful, and engaging.
My interest in politics and history comes from a lifelong curiosity about power — who holds it, how it’s used, and how ordinary people are affected by it. Over the years, I’ve seen how narratives are built, how facts are bent to fit agendas, and how history is used as both a weapon and a guide. That’s why Political Nexus is more than a blog — it’s a space for reflection, inquiry, and conversation.

I write about:

Politics: current events, government decisions, and global trends that affect South Africa and beyond.

History: how past events continue to echo in today’s politics and society.

Media & Narratives: questioning how stories are told, what gets left out, and why.
When I’m not writing, you can usually find me [behind the computer creating stories to tell, exploring books on history and philosophy, debating ideas over coffee with friends, or experimenting with new projects.

At the heart of it, I see myself as a storyteller — one who isn’t afraid to challenge easy answers, ask uncomfortable questions, and look deeper than the surface. My hope is that readers like you walk away from each article not just more informed, but more curious.

So, welcome to Political Nexus. Let’s explore, question, and learn together.

See author's posts